Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Model scores of the 29,894 trials active now.
Model score 17% for any early termination, 3% for termination due to slow enrollment. Past trials like this one (phase, sponsor type and disease area, started 2008–2016) ended terminated 34% of the time (35 trials).
Finished trial that started 2008–2014: scored by a model trained without any trial from its start year, so its own outcome was never used.
How it ended
Completed on 2018-04-05, after 2010-09-02 start.
The score above never used this outcome: finished trial that started 2008–2014: scored by a model trained without any trial from its start year, so its own outcome was never used.
Termination over time, as the model saw it at the start
Cumulative chance of ending terminated (red) or completed (green) by each year from its start; it actually ended on 2018-04-05. The rest of the way to 100% is still running.
From the competing-risks survival model (termination vs completion, still-running trials censored), fit to trials that started 2008–2014 and recalibrated to termination rates over 2022–2024, since termination has become more common. Checked on past years, it still ran a little low when the rise continued.
What moved the score
-
Sponsor's past termination rate: 21.1% (raises risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Accepts healthy volunteers: No (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Drug's FAERS reports with a death: 31.1% (raises risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Wording of the registration (title, summary, criteria) (lowers risk) · Wording
Phrases that raised it: chemotherapypatient hasthe patientcelldisease
Phrases that lowered it: lenalidomidelymphomato comparedlbcland safety -
Disease area, cancer: Yes (raises risk) · Disease area
-
Phase: 2/3 (raises risk) · Design
-
Has a data monitoring committee: Yes (raises risk) · Design
-
Sponsor type: industry (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Minimum age: 18 (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Design: parallel (raises risk) · Design
-
Maximum age: not given (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Primary purpose: treatment (raises risk) · Design
-
Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years: 20 (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Drugs with FDA adverse-event history: 5 (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Collaborators: 0 (raises risk) · Design
-
Sponsor's past trials: 38 (raises risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months: 9235 (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
Every input that moved this score, largest first: SHAP contributions in log-odds, red raising risk and green lowering it. They describe the model, not causes of termination. Phrases are traced from the text features back to this registration's words, approximately.
The trial
Design
- Phase
- 2/3 (typical: 2)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Allocation
- randomized
- Design
- parallel
- Primary purpose
- treatment
- Blinding
- none
- Has a data monitoring committee
- Yes (typical: 56% yes)
- Responsible party
- sponsor
- Collaborators
- 0
- Keywords listed
- 7 (typical: 1)
Who can join
- Minimum age
- 18
- Maximum age
- not given (typical: 71)
- Sex
- all
- Accepts healthy volunteers
- No (typical: 9% yes)
Sponsor's track record
- Sponsor type
- industry (typical: academic or other)
- Sponsor's past trials
- 38 (typical: 32)
- Sponsor's past termination rate
- 21.1% (typical: 9.9%)
- Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years
- 20 (typical: 19)
Drug's FDA history
- Drugs with FDA adverse-event history
- 5 (typical: 1)
- Drug has FAERS history
- Yes (typical: 64% yes)
- Drug's FAERS reports before start
- 37376 (typical: 2148)
- Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months
- 9235 (typical: 412.5)
- Drug's FAERS reports marked serious
- 93.4% (typical: 85.6%)
- Drug's FAERS reports with a death
- 31.1% (typical: 15.9%)
Disease area and drugs
- Disease areas
- cancer, immunology, hematology
- Drugs matched to FDA substances
- etoposide, gemcitabine, lenalidomide, oxaliplatin, rituximab
Typical values are among the trials active now. Sponsor and drug history are counted only up to this trial's start date.
Similar finished trials
- Efficacy and Safety Study of Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus R-CHOP Chemotherapy in Untreated ABC Type Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma NCT02285062 · started 2015 · scored riskier than 70% of active trials completed
- Ibrutinib and Lenalidomide With Dose Adjusted EPOCH-R in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma NCT02142049 · started 2014 · scored riskier than 56% of active trials completed
- Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia NCT00963105 · started 2009 · scored riskier than 78% of active trials completed
- Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide for Patients With Relapsed / Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma) NCT01938001 · started 2013 · scored riskier than 78% of active trials completed
- Zanubrutinib, in Combination With Lenalidomide, With or Without Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma NCT04436107 · started 2020 · scored riskier than 23% of active trials completed
Closest by meaning of the registration text (PubMedBERT embeddings), among finished trials. How they ended is context, not an input to this trial's score.