A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Experimental Drugs in Adults With Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Who Are Either Treatment-naive or Treatment-experienced in Brazil
Model scores of the 29,894 trials active now.
Model score 7% for any early termination, 1% for termination due to slow enrollment. Past trials like this one (phase, sponsor type and disease area, started 2008–2016) ended terminated 6% of the time (876 trials).
Finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
How it ended
Completed on 2016-09-26, after 2015-04-27 start.
The score above never used this outcome: finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
Termination over time, as the model saw it at the start
Cumulative chance of ending terminated (red) or completed (green) by each year from its start; it actually ended on 2016-09-26. The rest of the way to 100% is still running.
From the competing-risks survival model (termination vs completion, still-running trials censored), fit to trials that started 2008–2014 and recalibrated to termination rates over 2022–2024, since termination has become more common. Checked on past years, it still ran a little low when the rise continued.
What moved the score
-
Wording of the registration (title, summary, criteria) (lowers risk) · Wording
Phrases that raised it: chronichepatitisstagethe purposepurpose of
Phrases that lowered it: evaluate theto evaluategenotyperitonavirand safety -
Accepts healthy volunteers: No (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Phase: 3 (lowers risk) · Design
-
Sponsor's past termination rate: 6.1% (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years: 78 (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Drug's FAERS reports with a death: 4.8% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Sponsor type: industry (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Design: single group (raises risk) · Design
-
Disease area, cancer: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Drug's FAERS reports marked serious: 63.5% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Primary purpose: treatment (raises risk) · Design
-
Minimum age: 18 (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Has a data monitoring committee: No (lowers risk) · Design
-
Number of arms: 1 (raises risk) · Design
-
Disease area, neurology: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
Every input that moved this score, largest first: SHAP contributions in log-odds, red raising risk and green lowering it. They describe the model, not causes of termination. Phrases are traced from the text features back to this registration's words, approximately.
The trial
Design
- Phase
- 3 (typical: 2)
- Number of arms
- 1 (typical: 2)
- Allocation
- not applicable (typical: randomized)
- Design
- single group (typical: parallel)
- Primary purpose
- treatment
- Blinding
- none
- Has a data monitoring committee
- No (typical: 56% yes)
- Responsible party
- sponsor
- Collaborators
- 0
- Keywords listed
- 5 (typical: 1)
Who can join
- Minimum age
- 18
- Maximum age
- not given (typical: 71)
- Sex
- all
- Accepts healthy volunteers
- No (typical: 9% yes)
Sponsor's track record
- Sponsor type
- industry (typical: academic or other)
- Sponsor's past trials
- 33 (typical: 32)
- Sponsor's past termination rate
- 6.1% (typical: 9.9%)
- Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years
- 78 (typical: 19)
Drug's FDA history
- Drugs with FDA adverse-event history
- 5 (typical: 1)
- Drug has FAERS history
- Yes (typical: 64% yes)
- Drug's FAERS reports before start
- 39280 (typical: 2148)
- Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months
- 7280 (typical: 412.5)
- Drug's FAERS reports marked serious
- 63.5% (typical: 85.6%)
- Drug's FAERS reports with a death
- 4.8% (typical: 15.9%)
Disease area and drugs
- Disease areas
- infectious disease, digestive
- Drugs matched to FDA substances
- dasabuvir, ombitasvir, ombitasvir paritaprevir ritonavir, paritaprevir, ribavirin
Typical values are among the trials active now. Sponsor and drug history are counted only up to this trial's start date.
Similar finished trials
- A Study of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir With or Without Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin in Direct-Acting Antiviral Agent Treatment-Experienced Adults With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection NCT02356562 · started 2015 · scored riskier than 8% of active trials completed
- Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir With Low-Dose Ribavirin QD in Subjects With Genotype 1a Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection NCT02609659 · started 2015 · scored riskier than 8% of active trials completed
- A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/ABT-450/Ritonavir Co-administered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Adults With Genotype 4 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Cirrhosis (AGATE-1) NCT02265237 · started 2014 · scored riskier than 16% of active trials completed
- A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir in Adults With Genotype 1b Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Cirrhosis NCT02219503 · started 2014 · scored riskier than 23% of active trials completed
- A Study to Evaluate Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir in Treatment-Naïve Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b-Infected Adults NCT02582632 · started 2015 · scored riskier than 6% of active trials completed
Closest by meaning of the registration text (PubMedBERT embeddings), among finished trials. How they ended is context, not an input to this trial's score.