Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination Therapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine Versus Candesartan Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled by Candesartan Monotherapy
Model scores of the 29,894 trials active now.
Model score 8% for any early termination, 1% for termination due to slow enrollment. Past trials like this one (phase, sponsor type and disease area, started 2008–2016) ended terminated 14% of the time (493 trials).
Finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
How it ended
Completed on 2016-02-29, after 2015-04-22 start.
The score above never used this outcome: finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
Termination over time, as the model saw it at the start
Cumulative chance of ending terminated (red) or completed (green) by each year from its start; it actually ended on 2016-02-29. The rest of the way to 100% is still running.
From the competing-risks survival model (termination vs completion, still-running trials censored), fit to trials that started 2008–2014 and recalibrated to termination rates over 2022–2024, since termination has become more common. Checked on past years, it still ran a little low when the rise continued.
What moved the score
-
Sponsor's past termination rate: 2.1% (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Accepts healthy volunteers: No (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Phase: 3 (lowers risk) · Design
-
Minimum age: 19 (lowers risk) · Who can join
-
Drug's FAERS reports with a death: 10.9% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years: 29 (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Design: parallel (raises risk) · Design
-
Wording of the registration (title, summary, criteria) (lowers risk) · Wording
Phrases that raised it: patienttherapytumoriicombination
Phrases that lowered it: evaluate theto evaluatedrugand safetyamlodipine -
Disease area, cancer: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Sponsor type: industry (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Number of arms: 3 (lowers risk) · Design
-
Has a data monitoring committee: No (lowers risk) · Design
-
Drug's FAERS reports marked serious: 76.2% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Drug's FAERS reports before start: 119216 (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Disease area, cardiovascular: Yes (raises risk) · Disease area
-
Blinding: double (raises risk) · Design
-
Primary purpose: treatment (raises risk) · Design
-
Sponsor's past trials: 48 (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
Every input that moved this score, largest first: SHAP contributions in log-odds, red raising risk and green lowering it. They describe the model, not causes of termination. Phrases are traced from the text features back to this registration's words, approximately.
The trial
Design
- Phase
- 3 (typical: 2)
- Number of arms
- 3 (typical: 2)
- Allocation
- randomized
- Design
- parallel
- Primary purpose
- treatment
- Blinding
- double (typical: none)
- Has a data monitoring committee
- No (typical: 56% yes)
- Responsible party
- sponsor
- Collaborators
- 0
- Keywords listed
- 1
Who can join
- Minimum age
- 19 (typical: 18)
- Maximum age
- not given (typical: 71)
- Sex
- all
- Accepts healthy volunteers
- No (typical: 9% yes)
Sponsor's track record
- Sponsor type
- industry (typical: academic or other)
- Sponsor's past trials
- 48 (typical: 32)
- Sponsor's past termination rate
- 2.1% (typical: 9.9%)
- Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years
- 29 (typical: 19)
Drug's FDA history
- Drugs with FDA adverse-event history
- 2 (typical: 1)
- Drug has FAERS history
- Yes (typical: 64% yes)
- Drug's FAERS reports before start
- 119216 (typical: 2148)
- Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months
- 21994 (typical: 412.5)
- Drug's FAERS reports marked serious
- 76.2% (typical: 85.6%)
- Drug's FAERS reports with a death
- 10.9% (typical: 15.9%)
Disease area and drugs
- Disease areas
- cardiovascular
- Drugs matched to FDA substances
- amlodipine, candesartan
Typical values are among the trials active now. Sponsor and drug history are counted only up to this trial's start date.
Similar finished trials
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy and Monotherapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Dose-Finding in Patients With Essential Hypertension NCT02944734 · started 2014 · scored riskier than 10% of active trials completed
- Candesartan Cilexetil + Chlorthalidone + Amlodipine Versus Exforge HCT®️ for Systemic Arterial Hypertension NCT05920005 · started 2023 · scored riskier than 33% of active trials completed
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine Besylate and Candesartan Cilexetil in Essential Hypertension Patient Who Are Not Adequately Controlled With Candesartan Cilexetil Monotherapy NCT02368652 · started 2014 · scored riskier than 12% of active trials completed
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine Besylate and Candesartan Cilexetil in Essential Hypertension Patient Who Are Not Adequately Controlled With Amlodipine Besylate Monotherapy NCT02368665 · started 2014 · scored riskier than 12% of active trials completed
- Study of Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696/Amlodipine in Grade 1 and 2 Hypertension Patients Uncontrolled by LCZ696 Monotherapy NCT06236061 · started 2024 · scored riskier than 30% of active trials completed
Closest by meaning of the registration text (PubMedBERT embeddings), among finished trials. How they ended is context, not an input to this trial's score.