AMPLIFY - D6571C00001 Duaklir USA Phase III Study
Model scores of the 29,894 trials active now.
Model score 4% for any early termination, 1% for termination due to slow enrollment. Past trials like this one (phase, sponsor type and disease area, started 2008–2016) ended terminated 6% of the time (528 trials).
Finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
How it ended
Completed on 2017-06-08, after 2016-07-05 start.
The score above never used this outcome: finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
Termination over time, as the model saw it at the start
Cumulative chance of ending terminated (red) or completed (green) by each year from its start; it actually ended on 2017-06-08. The rest of the way to 100% is still running.
From the competing-risks survival model (termination vs completion, still-running trials censored), fit to trials that started 2008–2014 and recalibrated to termination rates over 2022–2024, since termination has become more common. Checked on past years, it still ran a little low when the rise continued.
What moved the score
-
Wording of the registration (title, summary, criteria) (lowers risk) · Wording
Phrases that raised it: patientuncontrolledcancerrandomizationstable
Phrases that lowered it: copdand safetyefficacy andsafety offev1 -
Accepts healthy volunteers: No (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Phase: 3 (lowers risk) · Design
-
Minimum age: 40 (lowers risk) · Who can join
-
Drug's FAERS reports marked serious: 44.7% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Design: parallel (raises risk) · Design
-
Sponsor's past trials: 1382 (raises risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Drug's FAERS reports with a death: 6.7% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Maximum age: 130 (lowers risk) · Who can join
-
Disease area, cancer: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Has a data monitoring committee: No (lowers risk) · Design
-
Sponsor type: industry (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years: 162 (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Disease area, neurology: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Number of arms: 4 (lowers risk) · Design
-
Primary purpose: treatment (raises risk) · Design
-
Blinding: double (raises risk) · Design
-
Drug's FAERS reports before start: 123459 (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
Every input that moved this score, largest first: SHAP contributions in log-odds, red raising risk and green lowering it. They describe the model, not causes of termination. Phrases are traced from the text features back to this registration's words, approximately.
The trial
Design
- Phase
- 3 (typical: 2)
- Number of arms
- 4 (typical: 2)
- Allocation
- randomized
- Design
- parallel
- Primary purpose
- treatment
- Blinding
- double (typical: none)
- Has a data monitoring committee
- No (typical: 56% yes)
- Responsible party
- sponsor
- Collaborators
- 0
- Keywords listed
- 7 (typical: 1)
Who can join
- Minimum age
- 40 (typical: 18)
- Maximum age
- 130 (typical: 71)
- Sex
- all
- Accepts healthy volunteers
- No (typical: 9% yes)
Sponsor's track record
- Sponsor type
- industry (typical: academic or other)
- Sponsor's past trials
- 1382 (typical: 32)
- Sponsor's past termination rate
- 8.1% (typical: 9.9%)
- Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years
- 162 (typical: 19)
Drug's FDA history
- Drugs with FDA adverse-event history
- 3 (typical: 1)
- Drug has FAERS history
- Yes (typical: 64% yes)
- Drug's FAERS reports before start
- 123459 (typical: 2148)
- Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months
- 24244 (typical: 412.5)
- Drug's FAERS reports marked serious
- 44.7% (typical: 85.6%)
- Drug's FAERS reports with a death
- 6.7% (typical: 15.9%)
Disease area and drugs
- Disease areas
- respiratory
- Drugs matched to FDA substances
- aclidinium, formoterol, tiotropium
Typical values are among the trials active now. Sponsor and drug history are counted only up to this trial's start date.
Similar finished trials
- Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide and Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate in Stabile COPD Patients NCT03022097 · started 2017 · scored riskier than 4% of active trials completed
- Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate Compared With Aclidinium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) NCT01437397 · started 2011 · scored riskier than 6% of active trials completed
- Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Twice-Daily Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate Fixed Dose Combination in Chinese Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease NCT03276078 · started 2017 · scored riskier than 5% of active trials completed
- Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Fixed-dose Combinations of Aclidinium Bromide With Formoterol Fumarate Compared With Aclidinium Bromide, Formoterol Fumarate and Placebo NCT01049360 · started 2009 · scored riskier than 3% of active trials completed
- Study of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate Compared With Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) NCT01908140 · started 2013 · scored riskier than 3% of active trials completed
Closest by meaning of the registration text (PubMedBERT embeddings), among finished trials. How they ended is context, not an input to this trial's score.