IPO-NEC Trial:Study on the Efficacy and Safety Using Sequential IP Therapy and Oct Lar in the Treatment of Advanced GI NEC
Model scores of the 29,894 trials active now.
Model score 17% for any early termination, 7% for termination due to slow enrollment. Past trials like this one (phase, sponsor type and disease area, started 2008–2016) ended terminated 16% of the time (1,198 trials).
Finished trial that started 2008–2014: scored by a model trained without any trial from its start year, so its own outcome was never used.
How it ended
Completed on 2013-12-31, after 2011-09-30 start.
The score above never used this outcome: finished trial that started 2008–2014: scored by a model trained without any trial from its start year, so its own outcome was never used.
Termination over time, as the model saw it at the start
Cumulative chance of ending terminated (red) or completed (green) by each year from its start; it actually ended on 2013-12-31. The rest of the way to 100% is still running.
From the competing-risks survival model (termination vs completion, still-running trials censored), fit to trials that started 2008–2014 and recalibrated to termination rates over 2022–2024, since termination has become more common. Checked on past years, it still ran a little low when the rise continued.
What moved the score
-
Wording of the registration (title, summary, criteria) (raises risk) · Wording
Phrases that raised it: chemotherapycisplatintherapyenrollmentdays
Phrases that lowered it: pulmonaryscreeningdiseaseslivermale -
Accepts healthy volunteers: No (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Phase: 2 (raises risk) · Design
-
Sponsor's past termination rate: 0% (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Design: single group (raises risk) · Design
-
Sponsor type: academic or other (raises risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Disease area, cancer: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Sponsor's past trials: 9 (raises risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Drug's FAERS reports marked serious: 93.6% (raises risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Primary purpose: treatment (raises risk) · Design
-
Responsible party: principal investigator (lowers risk) · Design
-
Minimum age: 18 (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Maximum age: not given (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Number of arms: 1 (raises risk) · Design
-
Drug's FAERS reports with a death: 21.9% (raises risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Collaborators: 0 (raises risk) · Design
Every input that moved this score, largest first: SHAP contributions in log-odds, red raising risk and green lowering it. They describe the model, not causes of termination. Phrases are traced from the text features back to this registration's words, approximately.
The trial
Design
- Phase
- 2
- Number of arms
- 1 (typical: 2)
- Allocation
- not applicable (typical: randomized)
- Design
- single group (typical: parallel)
- Primary purpose
- treatment
- Blinding
- none
- Has a data monitoring committee
- No (typical: 56% yes)
- Responsible party
- principal investigator (typical: sponsor)
- Collaborators
- 0
- Keywords listed
- 0 (typical: 1)
Who can join
- Minimum age
- 18
- Maximum age
- not given (typical: 71)
- Sex
- all
- Accepts healthy volunteers
- No (typical: 9% yes)
Sponsor's track record
- Sponsor type
- academic or other
- Sponsor's past trials
- 9 (typical: 32)
- Sponsor's past termination rate
- 0% (typical: 9.9%)
- Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years
- 17 (typical: 19)
Drug's FDA history
- Drugs with FDA adverse-event history
- 3 (typical: 1)
- Drug has FAERS history
- Yes (typical: 64% yes)
- Drug's FAERS reports before start
- 22109 (typical: 2148)
- Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months
- 4114 (typical: 412.5)
- Drug's FAERS reports marked serious
- 93.6% (typical: 85.6%)
- Drug's FAERS reports with a death
- 21.9% (typical: 15.9%)
Disease area and drugs
- Disease areas
- none of the 14 tracked areas
- Drugs matched to FDA substances
- cisplatin, irinotecan, octreotide
Typical values are among the trials active now. Sponsor and drug history are counted only up to this trial's start date.
Similar finished trials
- Study to Compare Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin (IP) Versus Etoposide Combined With Cisplatin (EP) in Advanced and Metastatic Gastrointestinal Pancreatic and Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma NCT03168594 · started 2017 · scored riskier than 81% of active trials terminated
- Second-line Therapy for Patients With Progressive Poorly Differentiated Extra-pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma NCT03837977 · started 2018 · scored riskier than 70% of active trials completed
- CAPTEM or FOLFIRI as SEcond-line Therapy in NEuroendocrine CArcinomas NCT03387592 · started 2017 · scored riskier than 78% of active trials terminated
- Safety and Tolerability of Everolimus as Second-line Treatment in Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma / Neuroendocrine Carcinoma G3 (WHO 2010) and Neuroendocrine Tumor G3 - an Investigator Initiated Phase II Study NCT02113800 · started 2015 · scored riskier than 79% of active trials completed
- Platinum-doublet Chemotherapy and Nivolumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs) of the Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) Tract or of Unknown (UK) Origin. NCT03980925 · started 2019 · scored riskier than 84% of active trials completed
Closest by meaning of the registration text (PubMedBERT embeddings), among finished trials. How they ended is context, not an input to this trial's score.