A Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of ADO09 Versus Insulin Aspart in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Model scores of the 29,894 trials active now.
Model score 6% for any early termination, 1% for termination due to slow enrollment. Past trials like this one (phase, sponsor type and disease area, started 2008–2016) ended terminated 8% of the time (60 trials).
Finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
How it ended
Completed on 2020-06-27, after 2019-06-06 start.
The score above never used this outcome: finished trial that started in 2015 or later: the model never saw it during training.
Termination over time, as the model saw it at the start
Cumulative chance of ending terminated (red) or completed (green) by each year from its start; it actually ended on 2020-06-27. The rest of the way to 100% is still running.
From the competing-risks survival model (termination vs completion, still-running trials censored), fit to trials that started 2008–2014 and recalibrated to termination rates over 2022–2024, since termination has become more common. Checked on past years, it still ran a little low when the rise continued.
What moved the score
-
Wording of the registration (title, summary, criteria) (lowers risk) · Wording
Phrases that raised it: randomizationdiabetes mellitusacutetherapysurgery
Phrases that lowered it: trialclinicalsubjectsgastrointestinaldaily -
Design: crossover (lowers risk) · Design
-
Sponsor's past termination rate: 0% (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Accepts healthy volunteers: No (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Phase: 1/2 (raises risk) · Design
-
Disease area, cancer: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Has a data monitoring committee: not given (lowers risk) · Design
-
Drug's FAERS reports with a death: 7.1% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Blinding: triple (raises risk) · Design
-
Drug's FAERS reports marked serious: 69.0% (lowers risk) · Drug's FDA history
-
Sponsor type: industry (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Number of arms: 2 (raises risk) · Design
-
Primary purpose: treatment (raises risk) · Design
-
Minimum age: 18 (raises risk) · Who can join
-
Disease area, neurology: No (lowers risk) · Disease area
-
Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years: 5 (raises risk) · Sponsor's track record
-
Sponsor's past trials: 21 (lowers risk) · Sponsor's track record
Every input that moved this score, largest first: SHAP contributions in log-odds, red raising risk and green lowering it. They describe the model, not causes of termination. Phrases are traced from the text features back to this registration's words, approximately.
The trial
Design
- Phase
- 1/2 (typical: 2)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Allocation
- randomized
- Design
- crossover (typical: parallel)
- Primary purpose
- treatment
- Blinding
- triple (typical: none)
- Has a data monitoring committee
- not given (typical: 56% yes)
- Responsible party
- sponsor
- Collaborators
- 0
- Keywords listed
- 0 (typical: 1)
Who can join
- Minimum age
- 18
- Maximum age
- 64 (typical: 71)
- Sex
- all
- Accepts healthy volunteers
- No (typical: 9% yes)
Sponsor's track record
- Sponsor type
- industry (typical: academic or other)
- Sponsor's past trials
- 21 (typical: 32)
- Sponsor's past termination rate
- 0% (typical: 9.9%)
- Trials the sponsor started in the prior 2 years
- 5 (typical: 19)
Drug's FDA history
- Drugs with FDA adverse-event history
- 1
- Drug has FAERS history
- Yes (typical: 64% yes)
- Drug's FAERS reports before start
- 45749 (typical: 2148)
- Drug's FAERS reports in the prior 12 months
- 7707 (typical: 412.5)
- Drug's FAERS reports marked serious
- 69.0% (typical: 85.6%)
- Drug's FAERS reports with a death
- 7.1% (typical: 15.9%)
Disease area and drugs
- Disease areas
- metabolic, immunology, endocrine
- Drugs matched to FDA substances
- insulin aspart
Typical values are among the trials active now. Sponsor and drug history are counted only up to this trial's start date.
Similar finished trials
- A Trial to Assess a Co-formulation of an Insulin Analog and Pramlintide in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus NCT03916640 · started 2019 · scored riskier than 5% of active trials completed
- Comparison of Two NN1250 Formulations Versus Insulin Glargine, All in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes NCT00611884 · started 2008 · scored riskier than 5% of active trials completed
- Comparison of IDegAsp (Inclusive Three Explorative Formulations) With Insulin Degludec and Insulin Aspart Separately Injected in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes NCT01868568 · started 2008 · scored riskier than 1% of active trials completed
- Trial to Compare NNC0123-0000-0338 in a Tablet Formulation and Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Oral Antidiabetic Therapy NCT02470039 · started 2015 · scored riskier than 7% of active trials completed
- Comparison of Two NN5401 Formulations Versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30, All in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes NCT00613951 · started 2008 · scored riskier than 4% of active trials completed
Closest by meaning of the registration text (PubMedBERT embeddings), among finished trials. How they ended is context, not an input to this trial's score.